From: <Saved by Windows Internet Explorer 7>
Subject: CALENDRICAL CHANGES AND SOTHIC CHRONOLOGY
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 18:14:16 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="windows-1255"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Location: http://localhost:8780/pubs/journals/kronos/vol0601/074calen.htm
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>CALENDRICAL CHANGES AND SOTHIC CHRONOLOGY</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1255">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16640" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3Dwhite>
<H1>Calendrical Changes And Sothic Chronology</H1>
<H2>IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY</H2>
<P>Copyright (c) 1980 by the Estate of Immanuel Velikovsky</P>
<P>At the basis of Sothic computation lie the assumptions that the =
Earth, in=20
historical times, did not change its position in the solar system, or =
the=20
position of its axis, or the length of its year. Should even one of =
these=20
assumptions prove false, Sothic chronology loses its basis. In<EM> =
Worlds in=20
Collision</EM> (Part I, Chap. 5; Part II, Chap. 8), I endeavoured to =
show that=20
<EM>each</EM> of these changes took place, and more than once during =
historical=20
times. There I wrote (p. 124):</P>
<P>"There exists a direct statement found as a gloss on a manuscript =
of<EM>=20
Timaeus</EM> that a calendar of a solar year of three hundred and sixty =
days was=20
introduced by the Hyksos after the fall of the Middle Kingdom; the =
calendar year=20
of the Middle Kingdom apparently had fewer days" (Cf. pp. 123, 336, =
338).(1)</P>
<P>The cataclysm that brought the downfall of the Middle Kingdom (ca. =
-1450)=20
also brought a year of different length; and for the next half-century =
it was=20
not yet firmly established when a new disruption of the celestial order =
took=20
place. Then, for the major part of the time till the end of the first =
quarter of=20
the eighth century, a calendar of 360 days, of twelve months of thirty =
days, was=20
observed in the Old as well as in the New World.</P>
<P>But after -776, at fifteen-year intervals, more disruptions of the =
celestial=20
order took place which necessitated additional calendar reforms. New =
calendars=20
were introduced whose starting points were variously marked by: the =
beginning of=20
the Olympic games (-776), the Foundation of Rome (-747), the Era of =
Nabonassar=20
(-747), or the time of <EM>raash</EM> (commotion) in the days of King =
Uzziah=20
(-747). Also in Egypt, under Libyan rule (the eighth century), natural =
events=20
caused the inauguration of a new calendar (<EM>W in C</EM>, pp. 210-211, =
239,=20
355).</P>
<P>Note</P>
<P>1. "The length of the year during the Middle Kingdom is not known =
from any=20
contemporaneous document" (W in C, p. 123); the Palermo stone, =
representing the=20
length of the year during the Old Kingdom of Egypt, has a year of 320 =
days (L.=20
Borchardt, Quellen und Forschungen zur Zeitbestimmung der Aegyptischen=20
Geschichte, Vol. 2 (Cairo, 1935), p. 33, note).</P>
<P>
<HR noShade>
<FONT size=3D-1>\cdrom\pubs\journals\kronos\vol0601\074calen.htm=20
<P></P></FONT></BODY></HTML>

