From: <Saved by Windows Internet Explorer 7>
Subject: Is Venus' Heat Decreasing?
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 18:26:44 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="windows-1255"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Location: http://localhost:8780/pubs/journals/pensee/ivr01/51venus.htm
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Is Venus' Heat Decreasing?</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1255">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16640" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=3D#000000 vLink=3D#551a8b aLink=3D#ff0000 link=3D#0000ff =
bgColor=3Dwhite>
<H1>Is Venus' Heat Decreasing?</H1><EM>
<H2>Immanuel Velikovsky</H2></EM>
<P><EM>Not quite six years ago, on a summer</EM> <EM>day in 1966, 1 had =
an=20
unannounced visit</EM> <EM>by two young men, in their teens. They</EM>=20
<EM>brought me the news that I was selected</EM> <EM>the first honorary =
member=20
of the Celestial Observer Society, composed of high</EM> <EM>school and =
college=20
amateur astronomer-observers of New York City, with quarters at the =
Brooklyn=20
Technological Institute. The Society publishes a mimeographed monthly =
magazine.=20
The two delegates made their way from Brooklyn to</EM> <EM>Princeton, =
N.J., on=20
bicycles--a distance of</EM> <EM>60 miles. It was my first (and still =
my</EM>=20
<EM>only) honorary distinction; I reciprocated</EM> <EM>by publishing in =
the=20
December, 1966,</EM> <EM>issue of Celestial Observer the paper</EM>=20
<EM>reprinted here.</EM></P>
<P>The purpose of this paper is to suggest repeated measurements of the =
infrared=20
radiation emitted by the cloud surface of Venus. It is expected by the =
author of=20
this communication that a slow drop in the temperature will be detected; =
it is=20
suggested that the measurements should be made at synodical intervals. =
It should=20
be possible to determine the phenomenon in about five synodical periods =
of=20
Venus, or eight terrestrial years at the most. The measurements need to =
be taken=20
of the night and day sides of the planetary envelope and also of the=20
terminator.</P>
<P>The basis for this expected detection is in my maintaining that Venus =
is a=20
newcomer to the solar system (which is what the Romans also intended to =
indicate=20
by giving it its name). I argued <EM>(Worlds in Collision, </EM>1950) =
that,=20
under its massive envelope Venus, with a short but stormy history, must =
be very=20
hot, even incandescent, owing to the presence of natal heat, and to the=20
disturbance in motion with "a thermal effect caused by conversion of =
momentum=20
into heat" <EM>(Worlds in Collision, </EM>p. 371). I made this statement =
when=20
Venus was thought, due to the strong reflecting power of its clouds, to =
have a=20
ground surface temperature of only a little above that of the Earth.</P>
<P>I offer the new proposition as another crucial test of my theory. =
Since=20
"Venus gives off heat" <EM>(Worlds in Collision, </EM>p. 371), the drop =
in the=20
temperature of the ground surface must be reflected in a smaller drop in =
the=20
temperature of the cloud surface. In the 1920's E. Pettit and S.B. =
Nicholson=20
measured the cloud surface temperature and obtained ca. -25C for both =
sides,=20
illuminated and shadowed, which seemed paradoxical. But almost 30 years =
later=20
they recalculated their original finds and gave -38C for the day side =
and -33C=20
for the night side, which is even more paradoxical.<SUP>1</SUP> In the =
19mm=20
wavelength, Mariner II also found that the ground surface is warmer on =
the night=20
side, but hottest on the terminator.<SUP>2</SUP></P>
<P>In 1956 Strong and Sinton made known their measurements (1953-54) of =
the=20
cloud surface of Venus, indicating "approximately -40C" on both sides of =
the=20
planet, but found a gradient of 5 which they ascribed to the heating =
effect of=20
the sun, on the assumption that Venus rotates directly,<SUP>3</SUP> but =
since it=20
rotates retrogradely, the phenomenon is again in conformity with the=20
Pettit-Nicholson observations.</P>
<P>Bolometric measurements can be made to detect even a small fraction =
of a=20
degree centigrade. Were it possible to take the Pettit-Nicholson and the =

Strong-Sinton figures as a basis for comparison, the drop of circa 1C =
per eight=20
years would already be attested. But in view of the implications of the =
test,=20
also for the cosmology of the solar system, an exact series of =
measurements=20
needs to be organized, possibly by more than one team of observers. If =
Venus has=20
revolved on its orbit for billions of years, there should be no =
measurable drop=20
in the temperature of the planet that could be detected from its cloud =
surface.=20
But, if Venus' history is measured in thousands of years only, there =
will be=20
found a detectable drop in the temperature from the top of the cloud=20
envelope.</P>
<P><B>REFERENCES</B></P>
<P>1. E. Pettit, <EM>Astronomical Society of the</EM> <EM>Pacific, 67,=20
</EM>(1955), 293ff.<BR>2. F. T. Bareth <EM>et al., </EM>"Microwave =
Radiometers=20
in Mariner II Preliminary Report," <EM>Science, 139 </EM>(March 8, =
1963).<BR>3.=20
J. Strong, W. S. Sinton, <EM>Science, 123</EM> (April 20, 1956), =
676.</P>
<P>
<CENTER>*******</CENTER>
<P></P>
<P>Thus I maintained that should subsequent measurements show a falling =
of the=20
cloud surface temperature, if only in fractions of a degree per year, it =
would=20
reflect a substantial loss of heat at the ground surface of the planet =
and thus=20
document its youth. I repeated this claim in <EM>Yale Scientific =
Magazine, 41=20
</EM>(April, 1967).</P>
<P>In the July, 1968, issue of the <EM>Journal</EM> <EM>of Atmospheric =
Sciences,=20
</EM>Gillett, Low and Stein published a short paper ("Absolute Spectrum =
of Venus=20
from 2.8 to 14 Microns"). They obtained a definitely lower figure for =
the cloud=20
surface temperature than did Sinton and Strong eight years earlier. =
Gillett and=20
his co-workers wrote: "The reasons for the disagreement are not =
understood at=20
present."</P>
<P>
<CENTER>*******</CENTER>
<P></P>
<P>In the same paper Gillett <EM>et al, </EM>wrote on a different topic: =
"Two=20
fundamental problems are now apparent: (1) What mechanism accounts for =
the=20
strong absorption of sunlight in the 3-5 micron region? (2) What =
property of the=20
clouds causes the low brightness temperature between 8 and 10 microns?" =
They=20
only raised, but did not attempt to answer the question.</P>
<P>These are truly basic facts for the problem of the presence of =
organic=20
material (hydrocarbons and carbohydrates) in the atmosphere and clouds =
of Venus.=20
On this subject I intend to write for a subsequent issue of =
<EM>Pensee.</EM></P>
<P>PENSEE Journal I</P>
<P>
<HR noShade>
<FONT size=3D-1>\cdrom\pubs\journals\pensee\ivr01\51venus.htm=20
<P></P></FONT></BODY></HTML>

